|
|
Buyer Beware: Herd Mentality is a Prescription for Patient Compliance Failure
|
|
The word is out. Suppliers to large
pharmaceutical companies seem to have gotten the
message that patient compliance is a huge
problem — and a tremendous missed
revenue opportunity for their Pharma clients.
The supplier response has been predictable,
substantial… at times comical. One by one, the
suppliers have come out with bold statements and
aggressive advertising, explaining how they're in the
process of committing massive resources and
attention to the patient compliance problem. Huge
proposals… impressive flowcharts…
integrated solutions (that don't really exist)…
and monumental price tags (that do).
But buyer beware. There's a herd mentality,
and as a pharmaceutical executive, you'll want to
take a breath and be leery of the stampede of
companies now trying to cobble together disparate
people, functions, information and technology
— complicated moving parts, most of which
have never before even spoken to each other.
And here's the rub: Even if it were easy to piece it
all together, the approach — which takes the
doctor out of the mix and attempts to connect a third
party directly to the patient — is doomed from
the start.
In a nutshell:
- It all starts with the doctor. The physician
who makes the diagnosis and prescribes the
medication has the most influence over whether or
not a patient will remain compliant. Reminding
a patient to take his medicine via a third party might
help temporarily, but it's an after-the-fact band-aid; it
doesn't address (in any way) the "why's" of that
particular individual's noncompliance.
In the long run, it's the why's that make the
difference. You'll only uncover those if the doctor
is in the loop from the start (see previous FUSE
article, "Patient
Compliance: A Case Study in Success," for more
on this).
- Patients are motivated by better
communication with their doctor. Our direct
experience with over 250,000 physicians over the
past decade suggests that the single biggest
motivation for people participating in our programs is
the hope that their involvement will result in better
communication with their doctor. Patients want to
know that their doctor is in the loop —
their loop — and value an
approach which provides upstream information back
to the treating physician.
An anonymous third party check-in that drops in
out of the sky will do little to move the compliance
needle. At worst, it will disturb the doctor-patient
relationship, adding confusion and even mistrust to
the mix.
- Doctors don't want to abdicate
responsibility. No good doctor wants to be taken
out of the treatment conversation with his patients,
particularly if it means handing over the
communication role to an intrusive and ineffective
third party. Most, however, do want help
and support in managing compliance issues.
Consider this (using
NCPIE
Coalition data)…
In an average primary care practice of 2,000 patients,
60% (1,200) are "on medication." In practice,
however, nearly one third neglect to fill the
prescription (400). Even among those who do, over
one quarter (200) will stop using the medication
before the treatment regimen has concluded. Taken
together, this means that at any given time, the
average primary care doctor has 30% of his patients
(400+200) out of compliance.
Unfortunately, given the workload, doctors simply
cannot stay on top of this communication problem
— and it is a communication problem —
on their own.
The compliance solution, therefore, will be found
in:
- the design of simple content that provides both
parties with essential information, and
- the facilitation of patient-physician dialogue
outside of the doctor's office visit.
Doctor end-arounds don't work
Direct to Patient schemes have been around for a
long time and fundamentally have not worked,
principally because the physician has been left out of
the equation. In the end, doctors are and always will
be our best ally in resolving the patient compliance
issue.
The solutions which empower the physician to
better manage and relate to his or her own customers
will carry the day. Absent that, it's all just a lot of
smoke and mirrors.
P.S. One Enormous Caveat
Having lived through the early days of managed
care, and the painful adoption of practice
management and electronic billing systems by
physicians, there were a few hard lessons learned.
One in particular is that innovation at the
physician level which only offers partial
solutions to the doctor's problems are largely
rejected.
With practice management, this took the form of docs
rejecting solutions until they were comprehensive
— across all types of payers and all types of
relationships. Until this all-in-one solution was
introduced, doctors found it simpler to continue
administering one paper-based system rather than
several disjointed computerized ones.
I believe the same will hold true when it comes to
compliance systems. Global Pharma companies
need to recognize the need for
comprehensive compliance management
systems — across not just all of their drugs,
but
across those of their competitors as well. The
company that delivers that solution, will improve
public perception, improve credibility, and own the
physician relationship.
To share this bulletin with a friend or colleague, click here.
|
Lighting the Fuse… Practical Insights for Getting Results
by Dr. Stanley Wulf, M.D.
Tapping into the Physician's Aura
Adherence for the patient is an uphill struggle.
Human nature is such that forgetting, or not wanting,
or not bothering to take prescribed medication
(particularly with asymptomatic conditions such as
hypertension) is something most patients struggle
with day-to-day.
To counter this natural tendency among patients,
we must tap into the "physician's aura."
We know from experience with our programs that a
desire to act on the treatment recommendations of
one's doctor has tremendous influence over
behavior… provided the patient knows that
those actions are communicated back to the doctor.
Why? Because for most people, the
doctor/patient relationship is like that of teacher and
pupil. The doctor has an aura of benign,
all-knowing expert, and our experience has
demonstrated time and again that a direct request by
a doctor is stronger than that of parent, spouse, child
or close friend — the patient wants to do
something to please him.
But the aura dissipates quickly. Office visits are few
and far between, and the key, therefore, is to give the
patient the feeling that his doctor is always involved.
In our surveys we specifically and deliberately
say, "Your doctor will be expecting your results."
That statement, more than anything else we can say
or do, has proven to have the most influence over
patient behavior.
When we "extend the aura" of the physician —
through programs which enhance doctor-patient
communication and solidify the feedback loop
— we help patients be more compliant.
|
Shameless Self-Promotion
|
|
Download (at no charge) a PharmaVoice podcast
featuring our own Michael Ball (VP of Marketing) and
Paul LeVine (VP of Analytics): "Own It: Transforming
Public Perception of Pharma through Better Sales &
Marketing Practices."
In this 13-minute episode, Mike and Paul talk
about three key areas of brand management:
public
perception, principal stakeholders, and technology in
sales and marketing practices.
Click here to listen to a
soundbite.
Click here to download the
entire 13-minute episode.
|
|
|
Will The Doctor See You Now?
|
|
"Many physicians believe that a better educated patient
(in
terms of their disease) will lead to less questions for
the
practice and less phone calls to the office."
— InfoMedics Research, Fall 2006
|
About Us
|
|
InfoMedics creates an interactive, real-time means
for helping patients and physicians better
communicate about a diagnosed condition or
prescribed treatment.
This results in
improved health
outcomes and consistent increases in prescribing
levels for new prescriptions and refills.
|
Webcast
|
|
|